I’ll Link to Your Reviews

I’ll skip the preamble* and get straight to it: anytime I write a review here of a book you have already reviewed, let me know in the comments and I will link to your review. Reciprocity would be appreciated but I won’t be stringent about it.

Here’s a full list of reviews (click-through on their titles):

• The Difference Engine, by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling
• Firefly Lane, by Kristin Hannah
• Letter Perfect, by David Sacks.
• Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde, by R. L. Stevenson
• Swimming Pool Sunday, by Madeleine Wickham
• Women Astronomers: Reaching for the Stars, by Mabel Armstrong
• Four Letter Word, ed. by Joshua Knelman and Rosalind Porter
• Sourcery, by Terry Pratchett
• Atonement, by Ian McEwan
• Dining with Death, by Kathleen Molloy
• Four Secrets to Liking Your Work, by Munzio, Fisher, and Thomas
• The Ovum Factor, by Marvin L. Zimmerman
• Virus Games, by G. L. Sheerin
• The Sweet Hereafter, by Russell Banks
• Springtime on Mars, by Susan Woodring
• Little House in the Big Woods, by Laura Ingalls Wilder
• Fatal Voyage, by Kathy Reichs
• The Hobbit, by J. R. R. Tolkein
• Bridge to Terabithia, by Katherine Paterson
• Runaway, by Steve Simpson
• Farworld: Water Keep, by J. Scott Savage
• Stealing Athena, by Karen Essex
• The Last Plague, by Glen E. Page
• Awesome Lavratt, by Ann Wilkes
• Yellowknife, by Steve Zipp
• It Starts with You!, by Julia J. Austin
• What If . . . ?, by Steve N. Lee
• When We Were Romans, by Matthew Kneale
• First Daughter, by Eric van Lustbader

I’m actually a little bit embarrassed, looking back at some of those early reviews — but I will interpret my embarrassment as evidence that I am getting better. Right? Right! Onward and upward!

Happy linking.

*In fact, I’ll put it down here. I guess it’s the post-amble.

This idea was originally something — one of the many things — sparked by Dewey‘s Weekly Geek thing. And as with many Weekly Geeks, I thought about it and decided not to participate, probably because lots of them seem, at least, as though they are lots of work and, let us face it, I use too many commas in sentences like these, and am little bit lazy.  But I didn’t discard the idea at all … in fact, I’ve been thinking about it on and off since the original post. And now I’ve done it.

There actually wasn’t much to that, was there?